data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/010a4/010a4792f828d0dedcd34718c7fb27dd3ffc6580" alt="Round-ups"
The latest stories from the Florida blogs...
Progress Florida (Ray Seaman): A Government of the Wealthy
Why Now?: He Didn’t Get The Memo
Eye on Miami (Gimleteye): Former State Senate President Ken Pruitt to become a lobbyist
This is a new state blog for Florida's Senate, designed to keep an eye on the activities of the Republicans who misrepresent us in Tallahassee. If you are interested in posting at Florida Senate Watch, drop me a line at quinnelk@hotmail.com with some idea of your Democratic and/or progressive credentials and I'll add you as a blogger.
Rep. Dean Cannon, R-Winter Park, sent us this message this weekend: "As President (Jeff) Atwater and Speaker (Larry) Cretul indicated, talks aren't over. Folks are continuing to run numbers this weekend and I anticipate that they'll continue talking on Monday.
"Right now all the discussions are at the presiding officer level, and I know they are both doing their best to come to a resolution."
"Further, Your Grand Jurors find that the appropriation process that gives unbridled discretion to the President of the Senate, Speaker of the House of Representatives and Appropriation Chairman needs to be changed. This State should be guided in openness and transparency. The procedure currently in place requires that our elected Legislators vote on a final budget that they have no knowledge about because it is finalized in a meeting between only two legislators. This process allows taxpayers money to be budgeted for special purposes by those few legislators who happen to be in a position of power."
...
"Further, far too much power is given to The Legislative Leadership on these budget issues which led to this appropriation that was voted on basically hidden in a huge budget. Regular members has no idea that they voted to build an aircraft hanger for a college that owned no aircraft and funded a building on land that the State does not own. Your Grand Jurors recommend to The Legislature that it clean up this process and that the State of Florida become an example to the Nation as a State that works for the people and not the special interest of those who have money to influence The Legislature."
Florida House Democrats say:
· The Legislature should make it easier for citizens to vote instead of stifling citizen activism and participation in elections.
· Shame on Republican legislators for trying to suppress the vote with a self-serving rewrite of elections law that failed to stand up under scrutiny!
· Embarrassed by the exposure of their self-serving power grab, Republicans now must accept a severe neutering of House Bill 7149 (formerly known as PCB EDCA 09-08).
Read what news organizations have written about the Republican voter-suppression legislation:
· Orlando Sentinel, April 23, 2009
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/orl-editorial-voting-assault-042309,0,4626719.story
“The Republican majority has sucker-punched Floridians with a last-minute plan that would throw new obstacles in the path of citizens registering to vote, casting their ballots and amending the state constitution.”
· Ocala Star-Banner, April 22, 2009
http://www.ocala.com/article/20090422/OPINION/904221001/1008/OPINION?Title=-65279-65279-Embarrassed-on-elections-again
“The thinking behind this bill is inexplicable.”
· The New York Times, April 18, 2009
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/opinion/19sun2.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=elections,%20florida&st=Search
“Florida legislators should not need a court to tell them not to interfere with the right to vote.”
· St. Petersburg Times, April 19, 2009
http://www.tampabay.com/opinion/editorials/article993149.ece
“Republican legislative leaders have lost all sense of shame with their 11th-hour bill to roll back voting rights in Florida.”
· The Miami Herald, April 21, 2009
http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/editorials/story/1009469.html
“The sweeping rewrite of Florida's election laws by the Republican majority last week is a flagrant example of power politics at its worst. Here we have legislation authored in secrecy and haste, which has been bereft of meaningful public input or comment.”
· SUN Newspapers (Southwest Florida), April 24, 2009
http://www.sunnewspapers.net/articles/edStory.aspx?articleID=436162
“There is every reason to increase Florida’s efforts to extend the voting process and make it as accessible to as many people as possible.”
· The Gainesville Sun, April 23, 2009
http://www.gainesville.com/article/20090423/OPINION01/904231015/1076/OPINION?Title=Editorial-A-bad-election-bill
“This legislation is shadowy and shameful.”
· Daytona Beach News-Journal, April 22, 2009
http://www.newsjournalonline.com/NewsJournalOnline/Opinion/Editorials/opnOPN40042109.htm
“This legislation is especially puzzling because Florida, after a long history of troubled elections, had seemed to finally get it right. There were very few problems with the 2008 election -- and neither House nor Senate version of the legislation would solve 2008's biggest problem: Long lines at early-voting stations around the state, which forced many voters to wait for hours to cast their ballot.”
· (Sarasota) Herald Tribune, April 21, 2009
http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20090421/OPINION/904211031/2198/OPINION?Title=Why-rush-to-change-election-laws-Legislature-should-shelve-a-troubling-costly-bill
“Why? How did such relatively low-priority legislation manage to squeeze itself into a session that is already hard-pressed for time to grapple with such essential issues as tax reform and renewable energy policy? What is driving the ill-advised election measure?”
Senator Wise has introduced CS/SB1680 to legislate an ambitious pilot program for reading teachers who serve ESOL students. The proposal reflects a concrete action plan and seems to reflect an understanding that data should be gathered upon which to base decisions. However, this hastily crafted bill falls far short of what is needed and asks for what is currently impossible.
1) According the staff analysis, the DOE would have to find resources within its budget to meet the legislative requirements. In other words, it is an unfunded mandate. The implementation requires data and documentation efforts from participating school districts that would also be unfunded. The analysis states that these should not result in "very much" fiscal impact.
In a time of extraordinary budgetary squeeze, the proposal is amazing. It supposes the DOE has funding and resources available to complete the requirements and cannot even estimate what the costs would be. The school districts all across the state are scrambling to operate with less and less. To ask them to divert a single penny and add even a single burden to already extended resources reflect a disconnect with the current state of affairs.
2) As the bill reads, a rapid timeline applies. Beginning 2009, the DOE would have to identify, find funds for, and convene a team of experts, complete a review of existing professional development standards, design courses, produce training materials, train trainers, incorporate input from the field, identify participating districts, flag students, train teachers, and begin implementation in the 2009-2010 school year. That means training begins in August 2009. How will a quality program be the outcome with such an unfunded supersonic timeline? This plan, as written, establishes a recipe for failure.
3) The proposed pilot is incomplete as it fails to evaluate all paths leading to authorization for assignments in reading and ESOL. Its narrow focus leaves much important work undone. The level of complexity is not fully addressed for the benefit of teachers and students. Let us get it done right the first time. We seem to have a lot of time to do things incorrectly, and no time to get it right.
4) The proposed pilot includes an important evaluation component. That's a good thing. However, the proposed evaluation plan is incomplete and far too narrow to provide meaningful quantitative and qualitative data to make meaningful recommendations. This plan does not meet the basic standards for professional development evaluation making it a waste of time and a waste of scarce education funds.
The bill requires that the DOE analyze the data and then make a recommendation. To ensure impartiality and objectivity, no state agency should be in charge of evaluating this program. The evaluation of data should be conducted by a non-governmental, independent and professionally recognized evaluator. In light of the controversy that has swirled over the issue for the last three years, an independent evaluator is needed to achieve a sense of fair accountability.
4) And finally, this is the third bill Senator Wise has sponsored on this issue. The first was vetoed and the second died. This bill represents a view that does not match Florida's legal obligations and according to the Staff Analysis, is not consistent with the Department of Education interpretation of the same.
I will join efforts to oppose yet another ill-conceived plan that brings Florida's ELLs no closer to highly qualified reading teachers. I am confident our state leaders will take these views into consideration and make short shrift of this third and equally misguided effort. The majority of our legislators, like Florida's voters, want all our children to learn to read in English and teachers prepared to teach all our students to read in English. To date, two county commissions and several municipalities have passed ESOL resolutions regarding professional development representing some four million constituents reflecting this same expectation.
On March 18th, the House Health Regulation Committee heard HB 983, the mandatory ultrasound bill by Rep. Flores (R-114) and Rep. Burgin (R-56). HB 983 passed out of the Committee by a 5-2 vote. Representative Jimmy Patronis (R-6), chair of the Health Care Regulation Policy Committee, gave a hearing to HB 983, yet has not given a hearing to the Prevention First Act (HB 129)!
The Prevention First Act increases access to birth control and helps to reduce unintended pregnancies by guaranteeing access to emergency contraception for rape survivors, protecting the right to birth control for all women, and protecting the right to have lawful and valid prescriptions filled at the pharmacy.
TAKE ACTION:
Contact Chair of the House Health Regulation Committee, Representative Jimmy Patronis (R-6) at (850) 488-9696.
Simply say:
• I am disappointed that Rep. Patronis voted for HB 983, a bill that ties the hands of doctors and interferes with the doctor-patient relationship.
• I urge Rep. Patronis to support commonsense policies that will prevent unintended pregnancy and reduce the need for abortion and agenda HB 129 the Prevention First Act as soon as possible.
• During this economic crisis, the Florida legislature should be spending it’s time on the budget, not on divisive abortion bills.
Then, Call or email Chair Don Gaetz (R-4) at (850) 487-5009
When Calling Chair Gaetz, simply say: Please put prevention first and give SB 310, the Prevention First Act, a fair hearing.
Additional comments to include when calling Senator Gaetz:
• The Prevention First Act is a commonsense measure which reduces unintended pregnancy by increasing access to birth control.
• Expanding access to birth control is the best way to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and the need for abortion.
• Preventing unintended pregnancy and reducing the need for abortion is something we can all agree on.
Please contact us at info@floridachoice.org to tell us the results of your call. Thank you.
Senate Democratic Leader Al Lawson (D-Tallahassee) on Tuesday called on the Chairman of the powerful Senate Policy and Steering Committee on Ways and Means to bypass a lengthy appropriations process and move instead to authorize immediate approval of stimulus funds for shovel ready transportation projects.
He also sharply criticized the apparent paralysis of the governor to create a federally-mandated website outlining the projects for both job seekers and job bidders, and the inability of the state transportation agency to move the proposed road projects from the draft stage to a final product.
“It has come to my attention that the federal stimulus money may be in jeopardy of speedily reaching those Floridians desperately in need of an economic life raft,” wrote Lawson in a letter to Chairman J. D. Alexander. “There appear to be three impediments to jumpstarting our economy via the stimulus package.”
According to Lawson, the first obstacle is the governor’s office, which has not followed the lead of Georgia or Alabama or any of the 26 states which have their websites up and running. “How are potential job seekers or potential job bidders supposed to know what’s available without the transparency the governor once promised? His office’s assertion that the website “is coming soon” is little consolation to those floundering in cyber silence,” Lawson noted.
The second is the perceived foot-dragging by the Florida Department of Transportation which, according to its own website, has not moved any of the proposed projects from the draft stage first outlined in early December. “Has nothing changed since then?” Lawson asked. “Is the agency prepared to explain why nothing more concrete has emerged to put tens of thousands of unemployed Floridians back to work?”
Lawson noted that while the Legislature may be unable to control the speed with which the governor and his agency move the stimulus plans forward, it does have the power to expedite approval of the road projects. It also has the power to remove potential political pitfalls.
“I don’t believe it is necessary to detail for you the concerns I have about legislative meddling in something so crucial to Florida’s recovery and her families’ survival. You and I are far too familiar with the political posturing and machinations that can occur when billions of dollars are at stake and individual lawmakers are deciding where that money is to go. Manipulation of those funds for political purposes is much too tempting, and I fear for the little guy when the big guys are calling the shots,” Lawson wrote.
“I respectfully request that rather than through a special spending bill, we authorize the Legislative Budget Commission, once the DOT submits a project request, to immediately release the necessary funds in order to get them moving.
“I think you will agree that with unemployment close to 9 percent, the last thing our job seekers want to hear is government bureaucracy impeding their ability to earn a living. AWI’s assertion that they’re ‘hoping it will be this year’ just doesn’t cut it.
“Floridians lining up for jobs are more than ready to don the shovels and get back to work. The power is in our hands to help them get there more quickly.”
The legislation implementing the cuts is almost too difficult for a laymen, including reporters, to follow unaided.
TALLAHASSEE – With hundreds of university professors, thousands of catastrophically ill Floridians, and scores of children’s programs on the line, Senate Democrats on Friday offered the Legislature for the second time in less than a year a billion dollar financial lifeline.
Senate Republicans threw it back - again.
“The money we found didn’t involve raising taxes a single penny,” said Senate Democratic Leader Al Lawson (D-Tallahassee). “It didn’t burden Floridians struggling to hold on to their jobs and their homes. And it didn’t attempt to raid teachers’ pay checks or toe the line of financial extortion on traffic tickets and court costs. All it did was wean some very wealthy special interests from the corporate welfare they’ve enjoyed for years. It’s time they joined the rest of us and paid their fair share.”
The money lifeline offered by Democrats came in the form of amendments sponsored by Senators Lawson and Dan Gelber (D-Miami) closing several tax loopholes tailored exclusively for high-end developers and non-Florida based corporations, and a review of certain exemptions. They were:
The real estate transfer tax loophole: Doc stamps most of us pay when property is sold are evaded by placing real estate into a trust, as one method, transferring the trust into a corporation, and then selling the stock in the corporation. For example, one company’s reported 2005 sale of six apartment complexes recorded the $300 million deal at only $60, and so avoided a $2.1 million tax bill. Estimates vary, but closing this escape hatch could fetch up to $200 million annually.
Combined Reporting: Closing this loophole could generate up to $400 million annually. Already eliminated by a growing number of states including New York and Texas, multi-state corporations such as some fast-food and toy store giants tap this loophole by setting up real estate rents or trademark fees through chains located in no-tax or very low-tax states, and so avoiding the tax due in Florida. This maneuver leaves those Florida-based and operating companies at a great financial disadvantage.
The third amendment involved sales tax exemptions – currently running in excess of $23 billion annually. The measure would have given the Legislature a process for review of all sales tax exemptions other than those for food, prescription drugs, health services, charitable and religious institutions, and certain others. The revenue generated from those exemptions eliminated would have been dedicated to education and the reduction of that portion of the property tax paying for local education budgets.
“We need to reexamine our priorities, especially when we face the severe damage we are levying on our social services programs and our kids’ education,” said Gelber. “It’s hard to justify a company using its toy logo to dodge Florida taxes when the very kids they’re selling to are about to lose their teachers.”
Friday’s efforts were not the first time Senate Democrats had attempted to stem the severity of the cuts to state services necessitated by the economic downturn. Similar efforts during the 2008 Legislative Session were also rebuffed by the Republican leadership.
“They can’t say they didn’t see this coming, and they can’t say they need more time to study these solutions,” said Lawson. “The longer the state waits for tax fairness, the faster the slide off the edge of the cliff.”